Page d'accueil
Période I
Retour à la Période II
Période III
Période IV
Période V
Période VI





CONTEMPORARY SURREALISM

Galerie Barbara Gladstone





Whenever in today's calculated art world a gallery or group of artists declare the emergence of a new movement, it strikes one as perhaps too indulgent and commercial an enterprise. The "New Hand-Painted Dreams: Contemporary Surrealism" show was in this way too obviously a packaging device. We are now indeed in the age of postmodernism, and are maybe too cynical for the youthful bombastic manifestos of emerging artists. The art world is united in a rare agreement that the age of avant-garde has passed away; little can be new, nothing can shock.

Instead of merely accepting the obvious degree of contrivance inherent in any "neomovement", it is a bit more enlightening to define what it is, in a show such as this, that seems like such a typical art-world concoction. If this point is to be made, as it should, one must locate the impetus for this "Contemporary Surrealism" in the present, rather than in surrealistic forefathers. Following so shortly after the phenomenal success of German neoexpressionism, the stylistic reinvention of surrealism must be observed with a slightly cynical eye. These neo-retro movements are more a statement of a contemporary perspective than a resurgence of previous ideas.

The equivalence of contemporary surrealism with neomovements lies in their formulaic reduction of art to its lost generic terms. A major by-product of the postmodernist dilemma has been an abandonment of invention in the name of mannerism. With the resignation of originality, the act of creation is determined by the visual rather than the intellectual. If superficiality is the risk, then art which is purely visual must allow its sensual pleasures as its philosophic ideal. No longer is surrealist painting embedded in a complex psychological inquiry into human nature; it exists completely without the original ideas from which it issued. There is little stream-of-consciousness painting here. It is, in fact, much too deliberate. Neossurealism is a calculation. Without the basis of its original intent, it is directed towards the picturesque. Whatever effects can be borrowed from the inspiration of others are arranged according to taste.

The predominance of a decorative ideal is not merely a phenomenon of neosurrealism. The affectation of artistic sensibility is a mannerism typical to today's confluence of styles. The annoying failure of the Gladstone show is that it cannot even articulate the specific nature of the movement it proclaims. The cohesiveness that marks the Pat Hearn Gallery (from whom artists Thierry Cheverney, Georges Condo and Peter Schuyff are borrowed) is noticeably lacking in the Gladstone exhibit. Its overall scattered eclecticism obscures rather than clarifies the group.

Within the inconsistencies of "New Hand-Painted Dreams" there is still a sampling of some of the most promising exponents of this loosely defined movement. Peter Schuyff is the quintessential neosurrealist. Schuyff, beyond all others, reduces surrealistic abstraction to its most decorative and superficial basis. If the trite beauty of his paintings isn't actually offensive, then they are amongst the most appealing being made today. Georges Condo well fits the title of the exhibition. His work is of a visionary nature, displaying a preciousness of gold that is nearly sublime. The clumsiness of his paintings, which is by no means a detraction, looks oddly sincere next to the slick paintings of Schuyff and Kenny Scharf. His collaboration with, and the individual paintings of, his German friend, Georg Jiri Dokoupil, are quite engaging. Dokoupil's Groszian doodles are refreshingly not surrealistic.




Carlo Mac Cormick


 



Retour à la Période II